Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules
Material type:
TextLanguage: English Series: Publication details: Cham Springer Nature 2019Description: 1 online resource (380 p.)Content type: - text
- computer
- online resource
- 978-3-030-12520-2
- Conflict of laws
- Criminal justice, Administration of
- Criminal law
- Human rights
- International criminal law
- Law
- Private international law
- Social justice
- thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JP Politics and government
- thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law
- thema EDItEUR::L Law::LB International law::LBB Public international law::LBBZ Public international law: criminal law
- thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences
- thema EDItEUR::L Law::LN Laws of specific jurisdictions and specific areas of law::LNF Criminal law: procedure and offences::LNFB Criminal justice law
Open Access Unrestricted online access star
This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. ;
Creative Commons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 cc
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
English
There are no comments on this title.